Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site hou3c.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!hou3c!WANCHO@SIMTEL20.ARPA
From: WANCHO@SIMTEL20.ARPA ("Frank J. Wancho")
Newsgroups: net.mail.headers
Subject: user-editable mail headers
Message-ID: <WANCHO.12041862597.BABYL@SIMTEL20>
Date: Thu, 23-Aug-84 21:26:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: hou3c.778
Posted: Thu Aug 23 21:26:00 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 25-Aug-84 07:28:12 EDT
Sender: ka@hou3c.UUCP (Kenneth Almquist)
Lines: 10
To: ihnp4!hou3c!ka@mit-eddie (Kenneth Almquist)
Cc: GDS@MIT-XX, Header-People@MIT-MC
In-Reply-To: Msg of 23 Aug 1984  09:30-MDT from ihnp4!hou3c!ka at mit-eddie (Kenneth Almquist)

Kenneth,

RFC822 says many things in different places.  One of them says that
the Sender: field MUST appear if the From: field is not "correct".
Another says that the Reply-to: supercedes the From: field.  So, in
spite of the "illegality" of the From: field, both the Sender: and the
Reply-to: fields were legal.  Your complaint should have been made to
the maintainer of your mail handler.

--Frank