Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!henry From: henry@utzoo.UUCP (Henry Spencer) Newsgroups: net.micro.68k Subject: Re: 68020 Performance Message-ID: <4316@utzoo.UUCP> Date: Fri, 14-Sep-84 17:23:44 EDT Article-I.D.: utzoo.4316 Posted: Fri Sep 14 17:23:44 1984 Date-Received: Fri, 14-Sep-84 17:23:44 EDT References: <3537@decwrl.UUCP> Organization: U of Toronto Zoology Lines: 33 Joe, I agree with most of what you say -- clock rates are not a realistic measure until you look at memory access times, and i/o bandwidth is quite important when evaluating multi-user machines -- but I've got a couple of comments. > MORAL: If you want to compare the 68020 (or any microprocessor) to > a VAX, wait for the figures on the forthcoming VAX chip sets ... The question is, will we ever see those VAX chip sets? As chip sets, not as overpriced packaged cpus. Existence is no guarantee of commercial availability, and conference papers are a poor substitute for chips in hand. > ... At the system level, the > microVAX line of small systems is designed and packaged more for > one-on-one personal use. ... So is the VAX 730, in my opinion. We've had to forcibly dissuade some local groups who've been mesmerized by Dec marketing into thinking that a 730 could run a dozen users doing statistics, just because of that magic word "VAX". My lousy little 11/44 will run rings around a 730 on anything which doesn't have serious address-space problems. And the 44 is a quarter the size and half the price. When address space is not an issue, the 44 will give a 750 a good run for its money, and the size and price comparisons *there* don't bear mentioning. For that matter, I note that the Murray Hill research folks now (I'm told) budget for a 750 for every 4 users. When is Dec going to announce some reasonably-priced big-address-space processors? I'd sure like one. -- Henry Spencer @ U of Toronto Zoology {allegra,ihnp4,linus,decvax}!utzoo!henry