Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles; site trsvax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!mgnetp!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!trsvax!mikey
From: mikey@trsvax.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.micro
Subject: Re: Charges filed in Mog-Ur BBS case - (nf)
Message-ID: <53400040@trsvax.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 6-Sep-84 14:05:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: trsvax.53400040
Posted: Thu Sep  6 14:05:00 1984
Date-Received: Thu, 13-Sep-84 07:27:02 EDT
References: <13064@sri-arpa.UUCP>
Lines: 20
Nf-ID: #R:sri-arpa:-1306400:trsvax:53400040:000:828
Nf-From: trsvax!mikey    Sep  6 13:05:00 1984

#R:sri-arpa:-1306400:trsvax:53400040:000:828
trsvax!mikey    Sep  6 13:05:00 1984



I don't know if this is the same case or not, but one of the articles
I read on BBS systems and their being nabbed stated that one operator
had a section of his board titled pirate or something of along that
line.  Now the operator can plead ignorance and I would be all for
giving the benifit of the doubt (It IS better to let 10 guilty go free
than punish 1 innocent) but if there is an enticement of a pirate
section to the board, I'd be really pissed if it was my sprint number
that was given out.  In the Delorean case the government was guilty of
entrapment, I think that a BBS sysop should be just as guilty if he 
promotes the collection of data for distribution.  This is NOT the same
as touchy info showing up in a public menu.

mikey at trsvax

How can anyone even think that these ideas are those of my employer!