Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site ucbvax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!ucbvax!upstill
From: upstill@ucbvax.UUCP (Steve Upstill)
Newsgroups: net.motss
Subject: Re: Natural vs. Unnatural
Message-ID: <1765@ucbvax.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 27-Aug-84 10:57:50 EDT
Article-I.D.: ucbvax.1765
Posted: Mon Aug 27 10:57:50 1984
Date-Received: Thu, 30-Aug-84 20:09:01 EDT
References: <3431@decwrl.UUCP> <387@watdcsu.UUCP>
Organization: U.C. Berkeley
Lines: 10

What is this here natural/unnatural stuff, anyway?  Seems like a rationalization
to this breeder.  I'm having a hard time figuring out what the implications are
of something being natural or unnatural, let alone the semantics of it.

My favorite words on the subject are those of Dr. HIPpocrates, medical sage of
the Berkeley Barb in days long past:

"An unnatural act is one which is impossible for human beings to commit."

Steve U.