Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 exptools 1/6/84; site ihuxi.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!ihnp4!ihuxi!cher
From: cher@ihuxi.UUCP (Mike Musing)
Newsgroups: net.motss
Subject: Re: Arndt articles
Message-ID: <1069@ihuxi.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 4-Sep-84 13:34:57 EDT
Article-I.D.: ihuxi.1069
Posted: Tue Sep  4 13:34:57 1984
Date-Received: Thu, 6-Sep-84 03:55:24 EDT
References: <1222@drux3.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Naperville, IL
Lines: 12



I suppose you can ignore Arndt, but ignoring the questions he raised
would be a mistake. Despite of some legendarily offensive lines in his
postings (made me look in disbelief) the points he makes are usually well
argumented. He supports them with excerpts from research papers, surveys,
some valid (for net postings at least) logic, etc. His efforts in composing
articles are such that it looks like a result of reaction formation towards
homosexuality :-). Still, those things are not important. The quality of
arguments is. If quality postings are ignored, the net would only suffer.

                            Mike Musing