Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site wivax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!hou3c!hocda!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!hplabs!hpda!fortune!amd!decwrl!decvax!wivax!dyer
From: dyer@wivax.UUCP (Stephen Dyer)
Newsgroups: net.motss
Subject: Re: "Love means . . . "
Message-ID: <19899@wivax.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 9-Sep-84 23:06:58 EDT
Article-I.D.: wivax.19899
Posted: Sun Sep  9 23:06:58 1984
Date-Received: Fri, 14-Sep-84 07:29:52 EDT
References: <3472@decwrl.UUCP>
Organization: Wang Institute, Tyngsboro, Ma.  01879
Lines: 19

Having returned to real life after a long vacation, I see there's
lots to wade through, including one of Arndt's typical misattributions.
First time around it was citing my words as Jym Dyer's; now he's just
placing words in my mouth.

>Being gay is not about sex; it is about love and affection.
>Or am I naive?
>
>      * No, just silly.  Like Steve Dyer when he talks of what happens
>        behind the bushes in the park between homosexuals as "affection".
>        Either he has never been there or he is . . . silly too.

Let it be known (grep affection /usr/spool/news/net/motss/*) that Steve Dyer
has never publically or privately confused public sex with affection.

-- 
/Steve Dyer
decvax!bbncca!sdyer
sdyer@bbncca.ARPA