Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site fortune.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!ihnp4!fortune!brower
From: brower@fortune.UUCP (Richard Brower)
Newsgroups: net.motss
Subject: Re: Re: Varied thoughts
Message-ID: <4216@fortune.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 12-Sep-84 20:21:18 EDT
Article-I.D.: fortune.4216
Posted: Wed Sep 12 20:21:18 1984
Date-Received: Fri, 14-Sep-84 21:08:32 EDT
References: <4194@fortune.UUCP> <1682@sun.uucp>
Distribution: net
Organization: Fortune Systems, Redwood City, CA
Lines: 26

>>From amd!decwrl!sunny Wed Sep 12 02:39:22 1984
>>> my original article
>>A request for definition of terms:
>>>Sisters of PI (and other similar groups if there are any)
This refers to the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence, a group of gay male
pagan nuns.  They ran an exorcism on Jerry Falwell when he held his
"pro-family" conference in San Francisco just before the Democratic
Convention.  They dress in rather fanciful versions of habits, and
have stirred up a considerable amount of controversy by what some consider
their irreverence to the Catholic Church.
>>>chickenhawks/queen
Gay males who are typified by chasing males much younger than themselves,
say under age 21 (or 18 depending on who you ask).
>>>drag queens
Men who dress in women's clothing.
>>The distinctions based on religion and race were obvious, and would
>>seem to be irrelevant subcategories of the major category "gay"?  Have
>>I missed something?  Why is e.g. religion a grouping factor within
>>sex?  Why aren't the groups divided on sexual factors within gay rather
>>than.... who cares...why bother.
Many Christians claim the gays cannot possiblity BE Christians at all, and
some gay people seem to agree.  That is the only reason that I included
these catagories.

Richard Brower		Fortune Systems
{ihnp4,ucbvax!amd,hpda,sri-unix,harpo}!fortune!brower