Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83 based; site houxm.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!houxm!gregbo
From: gregbo@houxm.UUCP (Greg Skinner)
Newsgroups: net.news.group
Subject: Re: Speaking of robotics...
Message-ID: <893@houxm.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 12-Sep-84 13:48:39 EDT
Article-I.D.: houxm.893
Posted: Wed Sep 12 13:48:39 1984
Date-Received: Fri, 14-Sep-84 20:58:38 EDT
References: <2156@mit-hermes.ARPA>
Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Holmdel NJ
Lines: 18

> From: dms@mit-hermes.ARPA (David M. Siegel)

> I think that a robotics group would be worthwhile.  I second the motion!

I am not familiar with the readership of net.ai, but it seems to me that (un-
less this is already the case) robotics discussions could continue in net.ai
until a significant portion of the newsgroup is seen to contain robotics
articles, then someone can go ahead and create net.robotics.  Note I didn't
say net.ai.robotics because a lot of robotics discussion is not necessarily
related to ai, and robotics has a wide enough range of subject matter to
warrant its own group.

How does everyone feel about this?
-- 
Hug me till you drug me, honey!

Greg Skinner (gregbo)
{allegra,cbosgd,ihnp4}!houxm!gregbo