Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site opus.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!hou3c!hocda!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!hplabs!hao!cires!nbires!opus!rcd
From: rcd@opus.UUCP (Dick Dunn)
Newsgroups: net.origins
Subject: Re: Did Dick Dunn Really do
Message-ID: <791@opus.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 18-Sep-84 02:29:37 EDT
Article-I.D.: opus.791
Posted: Tue Sep 18 02:29:37 1984
Date-Received: Fri, 14-Sep-84 07:36:43 EDT
References: <1141@hao.UUCP>
Organization: NBI, Boulder
Lines: 19

Aha!  At last, one question I'm really sure I'm qualified and able to
answer (maybe, I think, if I don't screw it up...)

> Did Dick Dunn *REALLY* agree to discuss creationism without
> reference to religion?????????

Almost.  What I did was pose a request to the "scientific creationists"--
namely, to give us an explanation of creationism which doesn't involve
religion.  Unfortunately, no one has done so yet, though it has been
necessary to point out the religion in a couple of response postings (by
which I've digressed to discussing religion, only to exclude it:-)  But I've
tried, Mike, honest I have.

Incidentally, I'm still waiting for a response to the question, "What (in
simple terms) is scientific creationism, as distinguished from religious
creationism?"  Should I repost the request or just forget it?
-- 
Dick Dunn	{hao,ucbvax,allegra}!nbires!rcd		(303)444-5710 x3086
   ...Keep your day job 'til your night job pays.