Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 6/7/83; site hao.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!hplabs!hao!ward
From: ward@hao.UUCP (Mike Ward)
Newsgroups: net.origins
Subject: Re: a creationist returns to the net - (nf)
Message-ID: <1144@hao.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 10-Sep-84 09:23:43 EDT
Article-I.D.: hao.1144
Posted: Mon Sep 10 09:23:43 1984
Date-Received: Fri, 14-Sep-84 20:29:53 EDT
References: <32500001@uiucdcsb.UUCP>
Organization: High Altitude Obs./NCAR, Boulder CO
Lines: 27

[]
to Ray Miller:

I get the impression that you do not consider the "normal" catagorization
of life into species, etc to be valid.  Is this a correst assesment
of your position.  If so, could you explain?

For the benefit of those us us who missed or forgot your previous
postings, will you please post a summary of the evidence that
caused you to change from being an evolutionist to a creationist?
Will you please tell us how it changed you interpretation of
the Bible?

I am especially interested in hearing about things that cannot
possibly be explained by natualistic laws.  (as opposed to things
that are not readily explained by the present set of known laws).

You imply that if naturalistic laws are not sufficient to explain
all observed data, then the current theory put forth by creationists
must be correct.  Is this a correct reading of your position?

-- 
Michael Ward, NCAR/SCD
UUCP: {hplabs,nbires,brl-bmd,seismo,menlo70,stcvax}!hao!ward
ARPA: hplabs!hao!sa!ward@Berkeley
BELL: 303-497-1252
USPS: POB 3000, Boulder, CO  80307