Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site ccieng5.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!hplabs!hao!seismo!rochester!ritcv!ccieng5!rdz
From: rdz@ccieng5.UUCP (Robert D. Zarcone)
Newsgroups: net.politics
Subject: Liberterianism
Message-ID: <515@ccieng5.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 24-Aug-84 13:17:53 EDT
Article-I.D.: ccieng5.515
Posted: Fri Aug 24 13:17:53 1984
Date-Received: Thu, 30-Aug-84 01:52:04 EDT
Organization: CCI Central Engineering, Rochester, NY
Lines: 31


>The question was asked what if you sue and they don't pay.
>One way of dealing with this problem would be to post such
>information.  I suspect that few people would want to deal
>in the future with someone who does not honor their contracts.

Sorry to rattle your tower, but your suspicion just ain't so.
I had four years of credit and collection experience, both
commercial and personal, before entering the computer industry.
The posting of judgements in newspapers is common practice
all over the country.  The same applies to bankruptcies.  My
experience has been that this does not have a great deal of
effect on the person's ability to gain future credit from some
source.

The case becomes even worse with corporations.  The cas here is
usually "here today, gone tommorow, back under a new name next
week."  And the Liber's idea of property might make a reposession
a tad difficult.  But then, I deeply feel that any "political
party" that would put the individuals needs above the common
good isn't really worth taking seriously anyway.

Don't you Liber's ever read the Constitution?  Or do you, like
most of *us*, interpret it to fit your way of thinking?  (Yes,
I'm guilty too!)  This is a serious question, so don't flame,
inform.

"The right to keep and bear armadillos shall not be infringed"
                                             Boynton