Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site omsvax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!decwrl!amd!dual!zehntel!hplabs!intelca!omsvax!batie
From: batie@omsvax.UUCP (Alan Batie)
Newsgroups: net.politics
Subject: 'None of the above'
Message-ID: <971@omsvax.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 1-Sep-84 18:17:43 EDT
Article-I.D.: omsvax.971
Posted: Sat Sep  1 18:17:43 1984
Date-Received: Sun, 16-Sep-84 06:22:02 EDT
Distribution: net
Organization: Intel Corp, Hillsboro, OR
Lines: 9

This has been mentioned semi-jokingly in several places, but I have not seen
any serious discussion.  Is there any reason why we should not have a
'None of the above' position on ballots?  If 'None of the above' received
the most votes, the election would have to be held with a completely fresh
set of candidates.  In light of the considerable derision of both the current
major presidential candidates, it would seem to be an idea whose time came
a while back.

	Alan Batie	...!decvax!microsoft!omsvax!batie