Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 exptools 1/6/84; site ihuxe.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!mgnetp!ihnp4!ihuxe!rainbow From: rainbow@ihuxe.UUCP Newsgroups: net.rec.bridge Subject: hand 1 bidding contest B4 Message-ID: <815@ihuxe.UUCP> Date: Mon, 27-Aug-84 18:45:48 EDT Article-I.D.: ihuxe.815 Posted: Mon Aug 27 18:45:48 1984 Date-Received: Tue, 28-Aug-84 00:32:37 EDT Sender: rainbow@ihuxe.UUCP Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Naperville, IL Lines: 39 "E"-comments from the experts "C"-comments from the contestants "R"-comments from me ******************************************************************* Hand 1: N E S W Vul:Both - - - 1NT(1) Imps S:A7 P 3C(2) ? H:AQT876 D:AQT85 (1)-strong C: (2)-weak 4H...6 experts...6 contestants...10 points 3H...4...........3................9....... dbl..2...........2................8....... 3NT..2...........0................8....... 4C...1...........0................8....... pass.0...........1................7....... ******************************************************************* R:most everyone had the same comments with regard to 3H and 4H calls. The 4H bidders felt partner would never raise holding KS or two red jacks. I agree. The 3H bidders felt conservatism should be better and trusted partner to raise with the right values. I however wouldn't hang partner by raising and punishing an aggressive 3H overcall made to get into the auction. E:dbl. If partner bids 3S, correct to 4H showing powerful two suiter. This way we'll get to five diamonds when 4H is wrong. R:it might work. But I don't trust my partners to figure this out. With my luck they'll insist on spades. E:3NT. Showing a red two suiter. R:unless I have a suit of my own, thats where I'd let the contract play. I like keeping auctions simple and avoiding confusion. E:4C. Showing a red two suiter. R:To me, this is a general strong takeout with no interest in playing 3C double. Once again I dislike the confusion aspect of this call.