Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site tikal.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!teltone!tikal!mark
From: mark@tikal.UUCP (Mark McWiggins)
Newsgroups: net.religion
Subject: Re: Playboy, Degradation
Message-ID: <12@tikal.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 12-Sep-84 16:19:50 EDT
Article-I.D.: tikal.12
Posted: Wed Sep 12 16:19:50 1984
Date-Received: Fri, 14-Sep-84 07:20:12 EDT
References: <213@laidbak.UUCP> <376@ihuxo.UUCP> <792@opus.UUCP>
Organization: Teltone Corp., Kirkland, WA
Lines: 13

> If you mean "after I read Playboy I discovered that I wasn't interested in
> seeing women degraded in that manner" I would agree.

I don't see how anyone says that Playboy "degrades women".  Editorially,
it's always been in the forefront of the women's rights movement.  Pictorally,
it displays them beautifully ... what's degrading about that?

I subscribe to Playboy, and for the record: I love, respect, and admire women.
So there!
-- 
----------------

....uw-beaver!teltone!tikal!mark