Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site fisher.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!princeton!astrovax!fisher!david From: david@fisher.UUCP (David Rubin) Newsgroups: net.religion.jewish Subject: Re: Who is a Jew Message-ID: <289@fisher.UUCP> Date: Thu, 23-Aug-84 08:23:32 EDT Article-I.D.: fisher.289 Posted: Thu Aug 23 08:23:32 1984 Date-Received: Fri, 24-Aug-84 04:06:22 EDT References: <1438@ittvax.UUCP>, <223@fisher.UUCP> <225@mit-athena.ARPA>, <253@fisher.UUCP> <255@mit-athena.ARPA> Organization: Princeton Univ. Statistics Lines: 82 >>Mr. Martillo is by far the most arrogant individual I have yet run >>into on this net. He has stated that my disagreement with his views >>DISQUALIFIES me from any input on Jewishness. When all those who are >>deserving of such disqualification are eliminated, only those who >>agree with Martillo will be left. (By the way, all of you who feel I >>ought to be disqualified need not read this) >I do not mind disagreement with my opinions and I do now and then >concede the correctness of other people's opinions. You may write to >Sophie Quigley or Larry Welsh for confirmation. Your disagreement with >my views does not disqualify your opinions on how the Jewish community >should define Jewishness but rather your denial of the existence of the >Jewish community which I can affirm does exist. Apparently in your >limited experience you have never had contact with the functioning >Jewish community -- probably because most Ashkenazim are no longer part >of the Jewish community. I never denied the existance of a Jewish community. To do so would be, as you say, contradicted by fact. What I said was that most American Jews have more in common with American non-Jews than with Jewish non-Americans. To say that this denies this existence of a Jewish community requires that you also believe that any individual can belong to only one community. I do not hold that supposition to be true, and find no contradiction in my asserting my membership in both the American and Jewish communities. >The denial of the existence of a Jewish community which is so easy to >find in New York, Boston, Nashville and many other cities is an >interesting example of fossilized Ashkenazi thought patterns. >Assimilated German Jews from the end of the 19th century until the >Hitler years also tended to deny the Jewish community and the >commonality of Jewish experience. Even admitting the obvious >differences between the Ostjuden (Eastern European Jews) and the German >Jews, I see no other community than the Jewish community in which to >place the German Jews. Certainly they were not part of the German >community. German Jewish voting patterns were quite different than >German voting patterns. German Jewish intellectuality followed many >different paths than German intellectuality. I will concede a very low >opinion of Hermann Kohn, Martin Buber, Franz Rosenzweig, Gershom Scholem >and their whole crowd but having read them I doubt they could have taken >part in the slaughter of a people as easy as most of their counterpart >German intellectuals. To me this implies an extremely different world >outlook. Later events in fact showed that the German Jews were part of >the Jewish community and not part of the German community. German Jews were always members of the Jewish community, and occasionally members of the German community, too. >I have yet to label individuals on the net idiotic, arrogant or moronic >although certainly all these types exist on the net. I have labeled >opinions moronic or ignorant. From the standpoint of Judaism limudei >torat moshe (studies of the teaching of Moses) are not acts of piety, >they are fundamental obligations of all Jews and I have little patience >with those Jews on the net who show greater familiarity with >intellectual second raters like Thoreau, Emerson, Mills, Jefferson than >with intellectual first raters like Maimonides, Nahmanides, Isaac >al-Fasi, Abarbanel, Judah ben Betsalel Loewe (Maharal miPrag), the Vilna >Gaon -- especially when these Jews show simultaneously no inclination to >correct this gross intellectual imbalance. All you mentioned were intellectual first-raters. >>Martillo, if the truth is so obvious to you, so writ in stone that no >>discussion can be carried on in good spirit, why do you bother >>participating in this group? It cannot be for your edification, as you >>clearly know it all. It cannot be for our edification, since you respond >>to contrary views with insults and rudeness. >Labeling as insults and rudeness the opinions of those who disagree with >you is a common net tactic. This tactic often covers up fundamental >ignorance which I suspect is the case here since David Rubin has shown >no familiarity with basic Jewish texts. You stated that I was not a Jew. You ought not wonder that I took this for an insult. Your implication that I am ignorant of basic Jewish texts is a false one. I showed "no familiarty" with basic texts because discussion is usually hobbled, not enhanced, by reference to "expert" testimony. David Rubin {allegra|astrovax|princeton}!fisher!david