Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 exptools 1/6/84; site ihuxi.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!mgnetp!ihnp4!ihuxi!russ From: russ@ihuxi.UUCP (Russell Spence) Newsgroups: net.singles Subject: Re: christians are not saints Message-ID: <1059@ihuxi.UUCP> Date: Thu, 30-Aug-84 11:55:52 EDT Article-I.D.: ihuxi.1059 Posted: Thu Aug 30 11:55:52 1984 Date-Received: Fri, 31-Aug-84 02:52:19 EDT References: <814@ihuxe.UUCP> Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Naperville, IL Lines: 57 > Christians=saints??? No way. As a loyal church goer for 18 years, I have > seen both sides of the fence. I have decided non-christians are a better > class of people. Of course there are exceptions, so please spare me the > flames. But the so called christians I was associated with had such low > ethics and morals that I couldn't stand the hypocrisy anymore. I find > non-christians much more understanding and considerate as a whole. > The christians acted so aloof that they thought they could do anything > because of course they would be forgiven. Like they had a free pass to > do evil. It made me sick with disgust. If these people are saints, well, > I want nothing to do with them. Give me the "sinners" any day. I'd rather > associate with them for the honest frienships they give me. > > Robert While I have found that many Christians are nice people, in some it seemed that their 'niceness' was very shallow because of their beliefs. They used Christianity to avoid their problems rather than facing them. By selective association and a limiting of activities they avoid anything that is a temptation or a threat to their beliefs. They retain a very close-minded attitude. This serves as a defence but makes them very dogmatic. The most stubborn and ignorant (in a sense) people I have ever seen were Christians. These people simply would not listen to other people's viewpoints if they didn't fall in line with their own beliefs. No flames please, I know that all Christians are not this, but it is a danger in Christianity that people can become like this in their quest to be 'nice'. I just don't have very much respect for people like this, no matter how 'nice' or 'good' they are. I have to agree with Robert that I have usually found non-Christians to be a better class of people, but I would like to qualify that by saying that this does not include all non-Christians, but those who were ex- posed to Christianity and made an informed decision to reject it (or at least reject the general interpretation of it). In my experience, it is the people with the best character and highest standards that reject the church, and for very good reason. It is precisely this type of person who hates hypocracy and shallowness. It can cause alot of resentment when one finds these qualities in an institution whose devine purpose it is to foster faith and honesty. Today's church has become very weak, spiritually and morally. I think that what we are seeing is that the people who find spirituality and morality (or what- ever kind of inner values you want to list) most important in their lives, are not looking to Christianity to satisfy themselves anymore. This is not to say that they might not remain in the church, but their dependence on the church for spiritual fullfilment may be small or non-existent. There also seems to be a growing group of very good and honest people who just don't want to have anything to do with Christianity. I think that this syndrome is just another symptom of the failure of the Christian church to keep up with modern values. (or perhaps a lack of the integrity necessary to maintain its own values in the face of the modern world). -- Russell Spence ihnp4!ihuxi!russ AT&T Technologies Naperville, IL