Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 exptools 1/6/84; site ihuxi.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!ihnp4!ihuxi!cher
From: cher@ihuxi.UUCP (Mike Musing)
Newsgroups: net.singles
Subject: Re: Huh? (Christians & Sex)
Message-ID: <1066@ihuxi.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 31-Aug-84 15:19:05 EDT
Article-I.D.: ihuxi.1066
Posted: Fri Aug 31 15:19:05 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 1-Sep-84 14:11:39 EDT
References: <2736@allegra.UUCP>, <235@uwmacc.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Naperville, IL
Lines: 19


History of "healthy" (DuBois style) sex includes such inventions as
nightgowns with little holes below the stomach level, chastity belts,
abstinence calendars allowing 40 days per year for sex, other wholesome 
little things like those. 

I wonder what Paul means by "husband and wife". Would polygamy do?
Would a record in mayor's book or a verbal agreement suffice, or 
does there have to be a ritual in a holy sanctuary? What types of
sanctuaries are valid? E.g. Does Moonie matchmaking count?

He makes the conclusion in the terms that he does not define, the 
conclusion represents totally WILD generalization, the whole
thing looks like an attempt to prove that black is white, and is
one of the more bizzarre pieces here. 

Little moral: Even Jerry Falwell is not always right.

               Mike Musing