Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site mit-eddie.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!mgnetp!ihnp4!mit-eddie!rh
From: rh@mit-eddie.UUCP (Randy Haskins)
Newsgroups: net.singles
Subject: Re: Playboy, honestly
Message-ID: <2658@mit-eddie.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 6-Sep-84 20:01:35 EDT
Article-I.D.: mit-eddi.2658
Posted: Thu Sep  6 20:01:35 1984
Date-Received: Wed, 12-Sep-84 02:12:49 EDT
References: <768@opus.UUCP> <244@uwmacc.UUCP> <338@voder.UUCP>
Organization: MIT, Cambridge, MA
Lines: 18

>     >> I do think that reading Playboy is unlikely to
>     >> bring one closer to God.

>     I do think that *NOT* reading Playboy is unlikely
>     to bring one closer to God.

I, on the other hand agree with Robert Heinlein on this point.
In "Stranger in a Strange Land," Michael finally "Groks God"
while having sex with Dorcas.  I don't think God is hung up
about genitalia and the use thereof and looking thereat.
I'm not going to be hung up about them either.  Actaully,
why am I submitting this?  I just remember that I've been
p.o.'ed about seeing all this religion-related flaming in
a group that should be devoted to talking about getting laid.
Well, this article talks about that, and it's funny, too, so
I guess I'll submit it.  Sorry....
-- 
Randwulf  (Randy Haskins);  Path= genrad!mit-eddie!rh