Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: $Revision: 1.6.2.14 $; site uiucdcs.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!tektronix!uw-beaver!cornell!vax135!houxm!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!kaufman From: kaufman@uiucdcs.UUCP Newsgroups: net.singles Subject: Re: What is an SO-ship, anyway? - (nf) Message-ID: <26600104@uiucdcs.UUCP> Date: Wed, 5-Sep-84 22:34:00 EDT Article-I.D.: uiucdcs.26600104 Posted: Wed Sep 5 22:34:00 1984 Date-Received: Sun, 16-Sep-84 11:45:59 EDT References: <1124@pucc-h.UUCP> Lines: 31 Nf-ID: #R:pucc-h:-112400:uiucdcs:26600104:000:1838 Nf-From: uiucdcs!kaufman Sep 5 21:34:00 1984 #R:pucc-h:-112400:uiucdcs:26600104:000:1838 uiucdcs!kaufman Sep 5 21:34:00 1984 [Be vewwy quiet. I'm hunting bugs. Heh heh heh heh heh!] Jeff asked about the difference between friends and SOs. I think the need to distinguish between one and the other is an unfortunate one. It is not so much a matter of black and white as a bunch of grays, some of which blend in with one another. Just as you wouldn't classify all your friendships (even limited to MOTAS) the same, putting your interpersonal relationships into two buckets [ACK - a computer scientist! -ED] is extremely limiting. One of the greatest crimes of this language (and others too) is that it forces thoughts into available words and alters non-verbalizable concepts. Important concepts get a lot of words to finely describe them; the proverbial example is the Eskimos' 20+ words for snow. Two english words for nonmarital caring relationships - friend and boy/girlfriend - are simply not enough! Naturally, here I am not counting terms identical in meaning. I try not to force my interpersonal relationships to be described by a word. I prefer for them to develop without such restriction, letting things evolve to a mutually optimal state of commitment. Unfortunately, many others do not feel this way and force themselves head-over-heels into a commitment or to stay (in their own concept of the term) "just friends", either of which denies them the opportunity to find an often desirable middle ground. Forcing the issue and classifying the relationship in one way or another is an uncomfortable process for both parties. Is it really necessary? I would be interested in hearing some responses, both concurring or opposing, as I feel this is a healthy one for debate and actually appropriate to net.singles(!) Till next time, this is ... Ken Kaufman (uiucdcs!kaufman) "I'm afraid that position was filled two weeks ago."