Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site ccivax.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!mgnetp!ihnp4!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!hplabs!hao!seismo!rochester!ritcv!ccivax!crp From: crp@ccivax.UUCP (Chuck Privitera) Newsgroups: net.lan,net.dcom,net.unix-wizards Subject: Re: Ethernet controllers/vendors (summary) Message-ID: <196@ccivax.UUCP> Date: Tue, 28-Aug-84 14:17:19 EDT Article-I.D.: ccivax.196 Posted: Tue Aug 28 14:17:19 1984 Date-Received: Sat, 1-Sep-84 08:27:22 EDT Organization: CCI Telephony Systems Group, Roch, NY Lines: 36 Thanks to all of you who responded to my request for advice on which Ethernet controller/vendor to use. Since I've received many requests asking me to forward my findings, I thought I'd post them instead. The responses I've received indicate only a few things: 1. The Interlan board is used widely and people are very pleased with both the board and the vendor responsiveness. (although it is NOT much exercised i.e. rarely need to call Interlan) 2. The 3com board is old and trouble prone. Hard to bring up and keep going. Problems are blamed on the early introduction of 3com (one of the first to offer Ethernet). Rumor has it that 3com is no longer supporting the Unibus Ethernet card anymore anyways. 3. The DEUNA received varied responses. One person stated they thought it was a poor piece of engineering, while another praised it (with a note "considering the driver was developed under eunice"). Also, I am told that the DEUNA takes about twice the power and Unibus resources as the Interlan. It seems clear to me that Interlan is the best choice. It is the most dependable and the vendor is responsive when they are needed. I hope this information will help some of you. Sorry if this came out too late, I just returned from 2 weeks vacation. Thanks again all you respondants, -- Chuck Privitera, Computer Consoles Inc. {allegra,seismo}!rochester!ritcv!ccivax!crp