Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site wjvax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!hplabs!pesnta!wjvax!ron
From: ron@wjvax.UUCP (Ron Christian)
Newsgroups: net.unix-wizards
Subject: Re: CSH -> SH converter
Message-ID: <193@wjvax.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 29-Aug-84 20:49:22 EDT
Article-I.D.: wjvax.193
Posted: Wed Aug 29 20:49:22 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 1-Sep-84 10:59:37 EDT
References: <12880@sri-arpa.UUCP>
Organization: Watkins Johnson, San Jose, Calif.
Lines: 21

From: bob@SU-SHASTA.ARPA:

If you are so tired of so many CSH scripts being published why don't you
demand that whoever did your port port CSH? Those who supply inferior
products (UNIX without Berkeley enhancements, etc.) should be forced to
clean up their act or go out of business!
****

Oh, I don't know, the Bourne shell has it's advantages over CSH.  For
one thing, it's one hell of a lot faster.

In any case, the sad truth is that some sites don't have csh.  Just
as some sites don't have source licenses.  Probably for the same
reason: Money.  This often isn't the user's fault or decision.  Let's
give him a break.
-- 

	"Trivia is important."		Ron Christian
					Watkins-Johnson Co.
					San Jose, Calif.
					(...ios!wjvax!ron)