Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site ucla-cs.ARPA Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!houxm!hogpc!houti!ariel!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!hplabs!sdcrdcf!trwrba!cepu!ucla-cs!dgreen From: dgreen@ucla-cs.UUCP Newsgroups: net.women,net.motss Subject: What About Culture, Politics, Unity? Message-ID: <1015@ucla-cs.ARPA> Date: Thu, 30-Aug-84 04:19:57 EDT Article-I.D.: ucla-cs.1015 Posted: Thu Aug 30 04:19:57 1984 Date-Received: Sat, 1-Sep-84 11:55:51 EDT References: <4061@fortune.UUCP>, <2113@hplabsc.UUCP> Organization: UCLA CS Dept. Lines: 83 WE ARE NOT FOCUSING VERY WELL Having been involved in a number of political groups before, the tactics used by Mr. Arndt and Mr. Ted really come as no surprise. Destruction of fruitful discussion is easy if you can appear well-intentioned. Indeed, both may be quite well-intentioned, but our ability to carry on extended discussion of cultural and political issues has been muddied substantially. Under these conditions, the first task is to recognise the goals and the problems. The goals are simple: To discuss cultural and political issues of relevance to gays. The goals do not include incessant defense of gay lifestyles or preferences. I have to defend my preference everyday in everyday life. I refuse to do that here. Its an absolute waste of my time, and yours. The problems are, likewise, quite simple: Distraction from the goals of the group can be accomplished readily in a no-discipline environment. We have no moderator. No one can intercede against one member for the overall benefit of the group. I.e., no one can stop Ken from flaming and no one can stop you from responding. WHAT CAN WE DO ABOUT IT? 1. STOP DEFENDING YOURSELF IN SITUATIONS WHERE DEFENSE HAS NO EFFECT. You know, and I know that Ken won't change his mind. With that in mind, who do you think you are helping by flaming back at him? You aren't helping the overall group, certainly. Most of us are gay. We already know that gays are OK. The person you are helping is Ken. He WANTS you to respond. There are many possible reasons for that, but sincere interest on his part is hardly one of them. You might be helping yourself, by getting something off your chest. Please, before you get something off your chest: THINK. Are you doing something constructive ... or is it destructive? Are you destroying the unity of the group for your own relief? 2. START DISCUSSING RELEVANT ISSUES. Here's some interesting ones: a. What distinguishes gay culture on the West Coast from that on the East Coast? I bet they are pretty different. Los Angeles is substantially different from San Francisco. b. What has been your experience in unifying gay men and lesbians in political or social groups? c. Are gays becoming "more right-wing"? d. What are your feelings about the focus of "gay money" in AIDS projects. The ones I know about seem to spend a lot of cash on patient support, and little or nothing on research. When the Reagan administration recently announced substantial cuts in the support of AIDS related research, should we be putting our money in to fill the gap? Or not? e. I liked the review of the Fourth Man. Has anyone seen Another Country? Its supposed to be a pretty good film, with a gay protagonist. f. What companies are known to have non-discrimination clauses for gays? g. Surely, you have some special interests within the gay community. What are they? A FINAL NOTE: Since it is impossible (and perhaps undesirable) to control disruptive behavior in a net group like this, we must impose self-discipline in order to nurture fruitful discussion. Please do your best to be a positive influence in this conference. Don't waste time defending yourself. It won't help. My next entry in the conference will discuss political motivation among gays (or something like that). IF YOU AREN'T PART OF THE SOLUTION, YOU'RE PART OF THE PROBLEM. Love, Dan Greening (ihnp4, ucbvax) !ucla-cs!dgreen