Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 UW 5/3/83; site uw-beaver
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!cbosgd!mhuxj!houxm!hogpc!houti!ariel!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!info-mac
From: info-mac@uw-beaver.UUCP
Newsgroups: fa.info-mac
Subject: Re: any brands of disks that are BETTER than Dysan?
Message-ID: <2186@uw-beaver>
Date: Sun, 11-Nov-84 02:47:50 EST
Article-I.D.: uw-beave.2186
Posted: Sun Nov 11 02:47:50 1984
Date-Received: Tue, 13-Nov-84 06:21:33 EST
Sender: yenbut@uw-beave
Organization: U of Washington Computer Science
Lines: 15

From: Thomka.es@XEROX.ARPA
According to some of my friends, that supposedly had seen results of
tests, Athana disks are at least as good as Dysan.  I haven't seen the
tests myself, so it is only hearsay.

I do use a fair amount of disks, and most of my 5&1/4's are Athana's.
Whereas only about 30 are Dysan's.  I have had one bad side of one Dysan
and no problems at all with the many more Athana's.  An interesting
sidenote is that I use both sides of my disks in my single sided Apple
drives, The one bad Dysan was a double-sided disk, and most (if not all)
of my Athana's are single sided.

Please don't respond to me, I'm only making a comment to an observation.

	Chuck