Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 UW 5/3/83; site uw-beaver
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxj!houxm!hogpc!houti!ariel!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!info-mac
From: info-mac@uw-beaver.UUCP
Newsgroups: fa.info-mac
Subject: disks
Message-ID: <2191@uw-beaver>
Date: Mon, 12-Nov-84 02:11:43 EST
Article-I.D.: uw-beave.2191
Posted: Mon Nov 12 02:11:43 1984
Date-Received: Tue, 13-Nov-84 19:18:29 EST
Sender: yenbut@uw-beave
Organization: U of Washington Computer Science
Lines: 15

From: shebanow%ucbernie@Berkeley (Mike Shebanow)

	This is just my personal opinion, but I would be very careful about
buying Dysan 3.5 inch disks. Dysan, for a  very long time, refused to even
consider making a 3.5 inch disk in favor of their own format. When their
microfloppy program bit the dust a few months ago, they rushed to get a 3.5 inch
disk ready for the market. I haven't used their disks, so I cannot say if they
are actually good or bad, but it seems to me that Sony (and Verbatim, and
Maxell, and BASF) all have a big headstart in development time. I haven't had
any problems with the Sony disks, and I think that they are probably the best
there is right now. Just because Dysan makes the best 5.25 disks doesn't
mean they make the best 3.5 inch disks.

	A. Shebanow
	shebano