Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site usc-cse.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!ittvax!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!usc-cse!randvax!%SRI-KL.ARPA,%SRI-CSL:decvax!ittvax!keegane@UCB-VAX
From: keegane%UCB-VAX@ittvax.UUCP
Newsgroups: fa.info-vax
Subject: Re: Vax reliability
Message-ID: <610@usc-cse.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 23-Oct-84 04:32:27 EST
Article-I.D.: usc-cse.610
Posted: Tue Oct 23 04:32:27 1984
Date-Received: Thu, 1-Nov-84 02:47:08 EST
Sender: uucp@usc-cse.UUCP
Organization: Univ. of Southern Cal., Los Angeles
Lines: 11

From: decvax!ittvax!keegane@Berkeley

Our experience has been totally the opposite here at ITT.
We have a number of VAXen, all flavors, uVAX thru 780's.
Got the MicroVAX a month ago, unpacked it, powered it up,
ran diagnostics, brought up ULTRIX-32m (beta-test) and its
been running ever since.  Typically, we've had no QC problems
with DEC.  I'm an ex-DECie and I would raise this issue with
your DEC District Marketing and Field Service persons to make
sure that DEC manufacturing gets the word that your site is
experiencing more that its share of QC problems.