Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 8/7/84; site ucbvax.ARPA
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!cbosgd!ucbvax!info-vax
From: info-vax@ucbvax.ARPA
Newsgroups: fa.info-vax
Subject: Re: Unibus Disks
Message-ID: <3241@ucbvax.ARPA>
Date: Tue, 13-Nov-84 05:13:02 EST
Article-I.D.: ucbvax.3241
Posted: Tue Nov 13 05:13:02 1984
Date-Received: Wed, 14-Nov-84 03:49:54 EST
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.ARPA
Organization: University of California at Berkeley
Lines: 13

From: Bill Mitchell <whm%arizona.csnet@csnet-relay.arpa>

Thanks for all the notes about the Unibus vs. Massbus disks; please keep
them coming in if you have something to say.

Let me pose a hypothetical question:  If you were putting disks on a
new 785 that was going to run 4.2bsd and you had to pick between a
UDA50 and 2 RA81s or a SI 9900 and 2 9751s (Eagles) and there was no
cost difference, which would you pick?  Note that this machine would
have a DEUNA and one UBA.

					Many thanks,
					Bill Mitchell