Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.6.2.17 $; site uiucdcsb.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxj!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcsb!andrews
From: andrews@uiucdcsb.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.abortion
Subject: Re: A Hypothetical Question (personhood)
Message-ID: <28000005@uiucdcsb.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 24-Oct-84 12:38:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: uiucdcsb.28000005
Posted: Wed Oct 24 12:38:00 1984
Date-Received: Fri, 26-Oct-84 02:49:27 EDT
References: <310@mhuxt.UUCP>
Lines: 7
Nf-ID: #R:mhuxt:-31000:uiucdcsb:28000005:000:283
Nf-From: uiucdcsb!andrews    Oct 24 11:38:00 1984

This analogy is a bit farfetched.  There is no such computer capable
of independent thought at this time, or in the foreseeable future.
Computers can only do what they have been programmed to do.  However,
a child can grow beyond his or her initial "programming".

				Brad Andrews