Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.6.2.17 $; site uiucdcsb.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxj!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcsb!andrews
From: andrews@uiucdcsb.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.abortion
Subject: Re: A suggestion...(long)
Message-ID: <28000011@uiucdcsb.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 3-Nov-84 00:41:00 EST
Article-I.D.: uiucdcsb.28000011
Posted: Sat Nov  3 00:41:00 1984
Date-Received: Sun, 28-Oct-84 06:54:29 EST
References: <2064@stolaf.UUCP>
Lines: 18
Nf-ID: #R:stolaf:-206400:uiucdcsb:28000011:000:902
Nf-From: uiucdcsb!andrews    Oct 27 21:41:00 1984

I believe that child-pornography is a matter of choice.  And that it is
up to the individual to decide whether he wants to participate in it.
This is rediculous.  The same could be said of murder, rape, incest, etc.
As many "pro-choice" people would say, I am personally against rape, but
I would not want to impose my views on others.  I personally would not
rape someone but I can't see passing laws to keep other from making
this personal decision.

We have legislated morality already.  Murder and rape are illegal.
Also, in all your arguments, you are ignoring the right of one important
person, the child.  It is not just a matter between a women and her
doctor, the child is always involved, and always on the losing end of the
stick if an abortion is performed.

Also, on a side note, why do people insist on often copying nearly entire
notes in the response right after them?
				Brad Andrews