Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site loral.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!ittvax!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcc6!loral!ian
From: ian@loral.UUCP (Ian Kaplan)
Newsgroups: net.arch
Subject: Re: 68020 Performance Revisited Again
Message-ID: <632@loral.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 7-Nov-84 14:05:33 EST
Article-I.D.: loral.632
Posted: Wed Nov  7 14:05:33 1984
Date-Received: Thu, 8-Nov-84 08:21:37 EST
References: <4133@decwrl.UUCP>
Organization: Loral Instruments, San Diego
Lines: 23


  I thought tha Joe Falcone's original article would generate a lot of
  lively discussion and it did.  I have enjoyed it and I am sure that I
  have learned from it.

  The various sides in the discussion have different perspectives and
  objectives.  The discussion so far has discussed the different design
  tradeoff which were made in these differing environments.  Recently the
  discussion has started to heat up.  I realize that this is nothing near
  what people say to each other in other news groups (ie. net.singles and
  net.flame) but I can see that the discussing is starting to drift away
  from an intelectual discussion of architectural merits.  

  The humble opinion of

                           Ian Kaplan
			   Loral Data Flow Group
			   Loral Instrumentation
			   8401 Aero Dr.
			   San Diego, CA
			   92123
			   (619) 560-5888 x4812
			   ucbvax!sdcsvax!sdcc6!loral!ian