Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.6.2.17 $; site ea.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxj!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!ea!mwm
From: mwm@ea.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.audio
Subject: Speaker Recommendation Summary
Message-ID: <1000022@ea.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 21-Oct-84 18:47:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: ea.1000022
Posted: Sun Oct 21 18:47:00 1984
Date-Received: Wed, 24-Oct-84 03:11:54 EDT
Lines: 31
Nf-ID: #N:ea:1000022:000:961
Nf-From: ea!mwm    Oct 21 17:47:00 1984

[We don't need your fascist groove thang!]

Below is the *summary* of the responses I got on my request for speaker
info. To save replay and tear on your memory, I asked for speakers in the
$500 to $800/pr price range, suitable for classical and early music, and
some new wave rock. If you want the complete text of the letters, send
mail.

	<mike

Avid or Boston Acoustics models.				whuxl!wjm
Boston Acoustics A150's						aatpdx!mcg

Snell type J, the M&K Satellite 1B, and the Vandersteen 2C.	drutx!pmr
The Vandersteen's are my favorite

DCM Time Windows						ulysses!smb
								inmet!rgh

the AR 9LS							hound!rfg
AR38s speakers							upvax!jeffg

the Phase Research model R speakers				plus5!hokey
an "Omnisonic Imager". [mwm - apparently a subwoofer?]

dalhquist speakers (DQ-8s?  *not* electroistatic)		down!north
Dahlquist DQM-9C's, Avoid the DQM-9				fisher!djl

the ADS series of speakers					sunybcs!arora
ADS 780 or 880 speakers.					gatech!spaf