Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site hou5e.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxj!houxm!hogpc!houti!ariel!hou5f!hou5e!cjy
From: cjy@hou5e.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.auto
Subject: who is at fault
Message-ID: <1026@hou5e.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 12-Nov-84 11:52:20 EST
Article-I.D.: hou5e.1026
Posted: Mon Nov 12 11:52:20 1984
Date-Received: Tue, 13-Nov-84 08:17:25 EST
Organization: AT&T Information Systems Laboratories, Holmdel, NJ
Lines: 17


The following is a description of an actual car accident to the best
of my knowledge:
  The driver in car A was driving down the hump of a bridge at 11:45 pm.
  It was raining and the road was very slippery. Car B, which was
  in front of car A, braked suddenly for some unknown reason.
  Trying to avoid a collision with car B, Car A skided and spun 90 degrees
  before it finally stopped without hitting car B. Car C was at a great
  distance behind car A and didn't see what happened because car C was
  going up the hump of the bridge when car A went out of control.
  As car C was coming down the bridge, car C didn't see car A because
  car A was stopped sideways and no lights were visible to cat C.
  When car C finally saw car A, it couldn't stop in time and
  smashed into car A.  Car B didn't stop after the accident.
  Two more chain-reacted collisions occured behind car C.
QUESTION:
  Which car (or cars) is LEGALLY responsible for the accident?