Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site west44.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!godot!harvard!seismo!mcvax!ukc!west44!lee From: lee@west44.UUCP (Lee McLoughlin) Newsgroups: net.bugs.uucp Subject: Re: Possible improvement: wizards opinio Message-ID: <389@west44.UUCP> Date: Thu, 1-Nov-84 18:23:18 EST Article-I.D.: west44.389 Posted: Thu Nov 1 18:23:18 1984 Date-Received: Sat, 3-Nov-84 08:02:09 EST References: <379@west44.UUCP> Organization: CS Dept., Westfield College, London Lines: 22 In article <> honey@down.FUN writes: >I guess you're suggesting that uucp try to keep exactly one command >file per site. I see no real advantage to this approach. >... NO! I'm not suggesting a single C. file per site, such a scheme would be *VERY* difficult to manage. For example you would have to reuse old entries in some way in order to keep the file to a suitable length, imagine all the problems that brings! All I wanted to do was to skip entries that have already been done. Some of the sites who use my uucp are V7 sites and I must work to my lowest common denominator so I cannot simply use a Sys5 based uucp. Nor can I borrow the features of such a version since its probably infringing licensing. So I'm forced, reluctantly, to re-invent them. -- UKUUCP SUPPORT Lee McLoughlin !ukc!lmcl kcl-cs!lee "What you once thought was only a nightmare is now a reality!"