Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site oliven.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!decwrl!sun!idi!oliven!rap
From: rap@oliven.UUCP (Robert A. Pease)
Newsgroups: net.crypt
Subject: Re: article in net.general
Message-ID: <698@oliven.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 2-Nov-84 12:16:12 EST
Article-I.D.: oliven.698
Posted: Fri Nov  2 12:16:12 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 3-Nov-84 21:26:18 EST
References: <63@unc.UUCP> <> <1784@nsc.UUCP> <15420@lanl.ARPA>
Organization: Olivetti ATC, Cupertino, Ca
Lines: 17

.

>Second, every time that such topic HAVE been addressed scientifically, the
>results are ambiguous or negative.  However, the proponents of the pseudo-
>science then proceed to either redefine the phenomenon (making the scientific
>study irrelevant), or to denounce the scientific team for allegedly 'covering
>up' the 'truth'.  Real sciences don't have this slippery effect.

I don't agree.  I have seen where large established  medical
institutions   have   covered   up  medical  discoveries  by
independents.  Take a look  at  cancer  research.  They  are
just  now releasing drugs that were known for their curative
effects 20 years ago.
-- 

					Robert A. Pease
    {hplabs|zehntel|fortune|ios|tolerant|allegra|tymix}!oliveb!oliven!rap