Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site utah-gr.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!pwa-b!utah-gr!thomas From: thomas@utah-gr.UUCP (Spencer W. Thomas) Newsgroups: net.cse Subject: Re: More on what should be taught Message-ID: <1225@utah-gr.UUCP> Date: Sun, 28-Oct-84 19:27:27 EST Article-I.D.: utah-gr.1225 Posted: Sun Oct 28 19:27:27 1984 Date-Received: Wed, 31-Oct-84 06:00:49 EST References: <405@sdcsvax.UUCP> Reply-To: thomas@utah-gr.UUCP (Spencer W. Thomas) Organization: Univ of Utah CS Dept Lines: 31 Summary: There is a very interesting comment on Computer Science education in the latest CACM. The editorial (by Denning) is based on discussion at the Snowbird 84 meeting (of chairmen of PhD granting CS departments). The meat of it is summed up in a single sentence: "Computer science stands alone among science and engineering disciplines: Our curriculum has the technology in the core courses and the science in the electives!" Most CS departments have, as their core curriculum, programming courses. The courses teaching the fundamental ideas underlying what we call Computer Science are generally electives. If, on the other hand, you look at a field such as Electrical Engineering (or Chemistry, or Physics, or ...), you find that the fundamental ideas are taught in the core courses, usually with an associated lab which teaches the "technology" of the discipline. Denning concludes: "... that computer scientists have no clear picture of the nature of their own field, which leads those from other disciplines to confused perceptions about us. We are projecting an illusion that we are mostly technicians and that our field has nowhere the same intellectual dept as the physical sciences or engineering..." I would be interested in seeing further discussion of his ideas (set forth "in full" in the editorial) on the net. I do have an ulterior motive - I am on our department's curriculum committee, and we are trying to do a major revision of the undergraduate curriculum this year. =Spencer