Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site fortune.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxj!ihnp4!fortune!olson
From: olson@fortune.UUCP (Dave Olson)
Newsgroups: net.lang.c
Subject: Re: on1 construct
Message-ID: <4594@fortune.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 5-Nov-84 16:41:17 EST
Article-I.D.: fortune.4594
Posted: Mon Nov  5 16:41:17 1984
Date-Received: Tue, 6-Nov-84 05:25:08 EST
References: <124@cadvax>
Reply-To: olson@fortune.UUCP (Dave Olson)
Distribution: net
Organization: Fortune Systems, Redwood City, CA
Lines: 38

In article <124@cadvax> jacob@cadvax.UUCP (Jacobo Bulaevsky) writes:
>What I've come up with looks like:
>
>#define on1(X) static char first_time_in = TRUE; if (first_time_in) {first_time_in = FALSE; X;} 
>
>But unfortunately this macro has to be used like:
>
>    on1  (
>        bla, bla, bla...
>    );
>
>which is VERY inappropriate.  Can anybody out there think of a better
>macro definition, comments, suggestions?

The macro you propose won't even work with most versions of cpp.  I
presume you meant that it must be used as:
    on1  (
        bla; bla; bla...
    );
(Note the ';' instead of ','. Most versions of cpp will NOT allow
macro functions with variable #'s of arguments.)
If your version of cpp accepts multi-line macros and invocations
(as most, and apparently yours, do), you can simply use:
    on1(
        bla1;
	bla2;
	bla3;
	...
    );

which looks *somewhat* natural if you read the parens as braces.
(Of course, if you use a ',' that cpp parses as an argument separator
(e.g. if(z) y=3,z=4) you are going to get cpp error messages...
Another potential problem is too long an argument list.  Since
first-time only code is usually fairly short, this won't be much of a
problem.)

	Dave Olson, Fortune Systems