Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.6.2.17 $; site uiucdcsb.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxj!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcsb!grunwald
From: grunwald@uiucdcsb.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.lang.pascal
Subject: Re: UCB PC Optimizations
Message-ID: <9300005@uiucdcsb.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 29-Oct-84 11:36:00 EST
Article-I.D.: uiucdcsb.9300005
Posted: Mon Oct 29 11:36:00 1984
Date-Received: Wed, 31-Oct-84 00:38:59 EST
References: <9300004@uiucdcsb.UUCP>
Lines: 6
Nf-ID: #R:uiucdcsb:9300004:uiucdcsb:9300005:000:308
Nf-From: uiucdcsb!grunwald    Oct 29 10:36:00 1984

Actually, I fibbed a bit -- you have to ensure that the for loop index is
type compatible with integers before making the shadow variable be a full
integer in a register. Otherwise, you'll get typing violations and whatnot.
But, that's a simple test to "compat", and the change to the increment still
holds.