Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 8/7/84; site ucbvax.ARPA
Path: utzoo!decvax!decwrl!ucbvax!douglis
From: douglis@ucbvax.ARPA (Fred Douglis)
Newsgroups: net.legal
Subject: Re: Disneyland assigns jobs by looks
Message-ID: <3018@ucbvax.ARPA>
Date: Fri, 2-Nov-84 13:50:08 EST
Article-I.D.: ucbvax.3018
Posted: Fri Nov  2 13:50:08 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 3-Nov-84 04:14:53 EST
References: <2408@sdcc3.UUCP> <690@oliven.UUCP>
Reply-To: douglis@ucbvax.UUCP (Fred douglis)
Distribution: na
Organization: University of California at Berkeley
Lines: 14
Summary: 

In article <690@oliven.UUCP> hawk@oliven.UUCP (Rick) writes:
>
>1.   It is their right to determine the criteria for their entertainers.

I agree that it is Disneyland's right to set criteria for their *entertainers*,
but I disagree that someone selling popcorn is an entertainer.  I don't believe
that performers (Beatles impersonators, for example) are the same as random
employees, such as vendors and maintenance personnel.

I wonder if it ever will get to a courtroom over this?
-- 
                                    
				    Fred Douglis
			ucbvax!douglis  douglis@ucbrenoir.arpa