Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site hou3c.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!hou3c!Jacob_Palme_QZ%QZCOM.MAILNET@MIT-MULTICS.ARPA
From: Jacob_Palme_QZ@QZCOM.MAILNET
Newsgroups: net.mail.msggroup
Subject: Re: quoted names
Message-ID: <75558@QZCOM>
Date: Tue, 23-Oct-84 14:48:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: hou3c.898
Posted: Tue Oct 23 14:48:00 1984
Date-Received: Thu, 25-Oct-84 04:03:27 EDT
References: <74674@QZCOM>
Sender: ka@hou3c.UUCP (Kenneth Almquist)
Reply-To: Jacob_Palme_QZ%QZCOM.MAILNET@MIT-MULTICS.ARPA,  Message_Group_at_BRL_mailing_list%QZCOM.MAILNET@MIT-MULTICS.ARPA
Lines: 11
To: Message_Group_at_BRL_mailing_list%QZCOM.MAILNET@MIT-MULTICS.ARPA
Cc: msggroup@BRL-AOS.ARPA
In-Reply-To: <74674@QZCOM>


     FROM: Mark Crispin <MRC@SU-SCORE.ARPA>

     I swear, though, if after we finally get into full compliance
     with RFC 822 dates they change the syntax to something
     incompatible AGAIN, I'll get the %&#@!

Surely they will. Do you not know that there is an international
standard for calendar dates. Something like this, I believe:
1984-10-23-17.43.59
for todays date.