Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.6.2.17 $; site uokvax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxj!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!uokvax!lmaher
From: lmaher@uokvax.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.misc
Subject: Re: Re: A vote for "nobody" this Novembe
Message-ID: <3800027@uokvax.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 29-Oct-84 18:25:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: uokvax.3800027
Posted: Mon Oct 29 18:25:00 1984
Date-Received: Thu, 25-Oct-84 03:14:50 EDT
References: <5150@brl-tgr.UUCP>
Lines: 31
Nf-ID: #R:brl-tgr:-515000:uokvax:3800027:000:1432
Nf-From: uokvax!lmaher    Oct 22 23:25:00 1984

> /***** uokvax:net.misc / brl-tgr!wmartin /  7:14 pm  Oct 11, 1984 */
> Hmm... This inspires a thought: Given this (realistic?) situation:
> 
> Postulate a local election in a small community, for an office such as
> mayor or councilman or the like. There are a couple "official" declared
> candidates for the office, whose names are on the ballot. There is also
> a space for a write-in. On election day, most of the voters (over 51%)
> write in the name "John Johnson" in the write-in space for this office.
> Now here's the key point: there are MULTIPLE "John Johnson"s living in
> this town, all qualified for election to this office. None of them has
> campaigned or otherwise indicated that they wanted to be elected on a
> "write-in" basis. What is the result?
> 
> ...
> 
> Does anybody have any idea what the various state election laws have
> to say about this situation? I would assume the result would vary
> from state to state. Comments or discussion?

No problem in Oklahoma!  Write-ins are illegal; if you mark your
ballot in any way except for checking the appropriate boxes, the
entire thing is invalidated and thrown out.

Every election year the Libertarian Party struggles to allow
voters to register Libertarian, and every election year after
they fail to get 10%, all the Libertarians get little notices in
the mail informing them they're now Independents.  

Carl
{allegra,ihnp4}!convex!ctvax!uokvax!lmaher