Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site duke.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!mcnc!duke!crm
From: crm@duke.UUCP (Charlie Martin)
Newsgroups: net.politics,net.misc,net.motss
Subject: Re: the Dartmouth Review, corruption
Message-ID: <4992@duke.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 26-Oct-84 11:33:41 EST
Article-I.D.: duke.4992
Posted: Fri Oct 26 11:33:41 1984
Date-Received: Sun, 28-Oct-84 06:17:57 EST
References: <1053@bbncca.ARPA>, <2511@dartvax.UUCP>
Organization: Duke University
Lines: 18

Aha!  From dartvax!betsy's article, it sounds like the Review
may have actually made some actionable statement (i.e. that 
caused someone real damage.)  I look forward to some action
from the campus GSA...

By the way, you said "not coincidentally" w/r/t the correlation
between a GSA-office break-in and the appearance of names in the
Review.  Are you *sure* it wasn't co-incidental?  Or was that
simply an assumption?

-- 


			Can you say "classical fallacy?"
			Good! I *knew* you could.

				Charlie Martin
				(...mcnc!duke!crm)