Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site duke.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!mcnc!duke!crm From: crm@duke.UUCP (Charlie Martin) Newsgroups: net.politics,net.misc,net.motss Subject: Re: Corrupting youth con't Message-ID: <4997@duke.UUCP> Date: Mon, 29-Oct-84 08:58:56 EST Article-I.D.: duke.4997 Posted: Mon Oct 29 08:58:56 1984 Date-Received: Wed, 31-Oct-84 06:03:24 EST References: <4953@duke.UUCP>, <1063@bbncca.ARPA> Organization: Duke University Lines: 37 Surprize. To a large extent, I agree with Ron Rizzo in this posting at least. I hope that won't prevent us from being able to argue a little ( no :-) -- I'm serious. Love a good agrument (in the technical sense of the word.)) In fact, I don't believe that I have enough information about what happened to make an argument about the ethical or moral points of the GSA thing. In fact, I simply haven't the time to research it. My reaction was, true enough, only to the points about freedom of the press, but don't make the mistake that I was makeing a merely legal argument. I feel that freedom of the press is an essentially moral or ethical issue, and was responding to what I felt was an essentially unethical argument. Also, I didn't research attempts by liberals to supress or silence conservatives, but if you think it doesn't happen, try being the only conservative Deist in a liberal behaviourist philosophy department. Or try reading a Playboy magazine in public in Boulder CO -- where an acquaintance had one torn from his hands and ripped up by a women who then proceeded to tell him that people who would read something like that should be shot. No more time for this, more later; but a question: have you actually *looked for* examples of anti-conservative action? Also -- where on National Review's masthead does it say " The National Agitprop Organ of the Buckley Family" -- I can't find it. -- Can you say "classical fallacy?" Good! I *knew* you could. Charlie Martin (...mcnc!duke!crm)