Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site cvl.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!umcp-cs!cvl!rlh From: rlh@cvl.UUCP (Ralph L. Hartley) Newsgroups: net.origins Subject: Still waiting Message-ID: <1444@cvl.UUCP> Date: Mon, 22-Oct-84 21:13:23 EDT Article-I.D.: cvl.1444 Posted: Mon Oct 22 21:13:23 1984 Date-Received: Wed, 24-Oct-84 07:36:57 EDT Organization: Computer Vision Lab, U. of Maryland Lines: 38 > > Come on, Paul, you said you were going to produce an explanation > > of what it is you are trying to defend in this newsgroup. So > > produce, and forget the trivia. > I already apologized for the delay once. I'm sorry to keep you > waiting, but I'm sure you wouldn't want me to run off half-cocked. No. We just want to make sure you don't get side tracked. I hope all this talk about researching the liturature is for real. I would hate to be disapointed (I love a good argument). Anyway I think you may be going a little to far. It's not the little detals that are going to kill you; it's the big things. > > "The number of arguments is unimportant unless some of them are correct." > Attributed by Michael Ward to Steven Hartley, this observation > may also be found, for instance, in "You take Jesus, I'll Take God" > by Samuel Levine, a book for Jewish people on refuting Christian > missionaries. I think that it had also been observed several months > back, by Rich Rosen in net.religion. My son (Stephen) cannot yet speak. It would indeed be "A touch of brilliance" if he were to say such a thing! In any case any plagerism that has occured was totally unintentional. I was completely unaware of the above sources when I wrote the line in question. I cannot help but agree that it describes both this groop and the net. > "Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ loved the church, > and gave himself for it." Ephesians 5: > Would you die for your wife? Perhaps. I haven't so far. Christians have no monopoly. Ralph Hartley rlh@cvl seismo!rlgvax!cvl!rlh