Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 beta 3/9/83; site uf-csg.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!uf-csv!uf-csg!hardie
From: hardie@uf-csg.UUCP (Peter T Hardie [stdnt])
Newsgroups: net.origins
Subject: Re: "being" explained
Message-ID: <240@uf-csg.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 2-Nov-84 10:13:53 EST
Article-I.D.: uf-csg.240
Posted: Fri Nov  2 10:13:53 1984
Date-Received: Mon, 5-Nov-84 21:03:11 EST
References: <1072@ihuxr.UUCP>
Organization: Univ of Fla, Computer and Information Science
Lines: 12

this is a comment on the last line of that article.  I agree that ex post facto
arguments are pointless.
	Also, the continual use of probability in anti-evolution arguments
fails to take into account both the time over which the "primordial soup" was
in existence and being bombarded by energy, and the total planetary population
of the Universe over which the same conditions apply.

	Any references to this article please use "Ex post facto" as a tag.

-- 
	Pete Hardie, Univ. of Florida, CIS Gould
		username: hardie