Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site uwmacc.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!uwvax!uwmacc!dubois
From: dubois@uwmacc.UUCP (Paul DuBois)
Newsgroups: net.origins
Subject: Re: Creationists vs Baby Fae
Message-ID: <446@uwmacc.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 9-Nov-84 09:30:46 EST
Article-I.D.: uwmacc.446
Posted: Fri Nov  9 09:30:46 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 10-Nov-84 06:21:42 EST
References: <266@cadovax.UUCP> <203@spp2.UUCP>
Organization: UW Primate Center
Lines: 17

> I read in the LA Times that a representative of the 7th-day
> Adventists, avowedly a pro-creationism sect, said that he had
> no problem with the Baby Fae transplant with respect to the
> creationism issue.
> 
> Presumably the interchangability of parts can be taken just as
> easily as evidence of the same creator of both species.
> 
> 	Mike

I think that creationists might be left to make that last statement
for themselves, if they want to.  Unless they do, you're putting
words in their mouths.  I can say "presumably evolutionists believe
X" but unless *they* say they believe X, my statement is not very
useful.
-- 
Paul DuBois		{allegra,ihnp4,seismo}!uwvax!uwmacc!dubois