Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site watmath.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!saquigley From: saquigley@watmath.UUCP (Sophie Quigley) Newsgroups: net.politics Subject: Re: Context of the Debate Message-ID: <9525@watmath.UUCP> Date: Tue, 23-Oct-84 03:43:41 EDT Article-I.D.: watmath.9525 Posted: Tue Oct 23 03:43:41 1984 Date-Received: Tue, 23-Oct-84 05:07:13 EDT References: <1052@ihuxm.UUCP> <1866@ucbvax.ARPA> , <1316@sdcrdcf.UUCP> Organization: U of Waterloo, Ontario Lines: 41 >>>the Shah of >>>Iran, who, despite the claims of Khomeni, was a very good ruler, >>> Wayne >> >>I would recommend >>that you read some of their reports on political repression in Iran >>during the Shah's rule. You might find there evidence of a few more >>things he did wrong. >>Sophie Quigley > >I'm afraid Sophie's right Wayne; I'm sure that, according to her defn. >no one has ever been a good ruler. But Sophie, consider this: don't >you think that he was probably the best ruler Iran ever had, and is the >best that could be hoped for today? > > sdcrdcf!alan (Alan Algustyniak) > Indeed, even the US (gasp!) has recently been under attack by Amnesty International because of their new medical techniques to administer the death penalty. I do not know enough about Iranian history to be able to compare its different rulers. For a while, towards the end of the shah's regime and at the beginning of Khomeini's it did seem that it would be possible to have some semblance of democracy in Iran. I do not think that Khomeini is much better than the Shah (actually I think he is much worse), but he does seem to have a much bigger following in Iran than the shah did, and no matter how despotic and cruel he is, he is ruling Iran because the iranians wanted him. So they've only got themselves to blame for the current situation! Hopefully this experience will be useful in the next government transition. I personnally do not see any reason why things could not improve in the future. The iranian revolution is still quite new, and looking at history, one often finds a period of very strong backlash after many revolutions (e.g the french and russian revolutions) followed by a relaxation. It is quite possible that the Iranian revolution will follow a similar pattern, as it is possible it won't. Sophie Quigley ...!{clyde,ihnp4,decvax}!watmath!saquigley