Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site mit-eddie.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxj!ihnp4!mit-eddie!lkk
From: lkk@mit-eddie.UUCP (Larry Kolodney)
Newsgroups: net.politics
Subject: Re: A Question for Libertarians
Message-ID: <2984@mit-eddie.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 25-Oct-84 12:11:14 EDT
Article-I.D.: mit-eddi.2984
Posted: Thu Oct 25 12:11:14 1984
Date-Received: Fri, 26-Oct-84 09:15:07 EDT
References: <1754@inmet.UUCP>
Organization: MIT, Cambridge, MA
Lines: 32

From: nrh@inmet.UUCP:
"To sum up: we ALL benefit from a free [libertarian] society, since almost all
of us MUST trade the fruits of our labors (or the labors themselves)
for food and necessities.  Restrictions on freedom in order to prevent
starvation provide a ready avenue for institutionalizing what could
otherwise be transient dependencies."
-----

I've never met a starving libertarian.  In fact all the libertarians I've met
have been well educated (usually thru public education), well fed (as a
result of  said education), and in general "have it made".  Having found
themselves in such a situation, and seeing the dire poverty surrounding
them, (in the US and rest of world), they invented a philosophy which
justifies their priveleged status by idealizing relationships between
people as mutually informed rational transactions.  They tend to be very
theoretical in their politics, using unrealistic analogies to make
questionable points.  But, when you come right down to it,
libertarianism is simply a matter of greed.  "I've got mine, and just
try to take it away from me."

Of course they will take it away from you.  Either thru taxes, as in the
present case, or expropriation, after the inevitable revolution which
will take place if the mediating influence of social programs
dissapears.  Take your pick libertarians, but first wake up and smell
the coffee.
-- 
larry kolodney (The Devil's Advocate)

UUCP: ...{ihnp4, decvax!genrad}!mit-eddie!lkk

ARPA: lkk@mit-mc