Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site fisher.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!princeton!astrovax!fisher!david From: david@fisher.UUCP (David Rubin) Newsgroups: net.politics Subject: Re: Fuzzy headed liberals Message-ID: <371@fisher.UUCP> Date: Fri, 26-Oct-84 09:41:42 EDT Article-I.D.: fisher.371 Posted: Fri Oct 26 09:41:42 1984 Date-Received: Sat, 27-Oct-84 03:45:06 EDT References: <569@loral.UUCP> <790@flairvax.UUCP> <2811@ucbvax.ARPA> Organization: Princeton Univ. Statistics Lines: 47 I just want to respond to a few of Milo's reasons for supporting Reagan: >I vote for him because he is percieved as being strong abroad, >esp. in the USSR. This is a statement of faith, not fact, as there is no emprical evidence that the Soviet Union has modified its behavior due to Reagan being in office. And why should they? Reagan is scrupulous about taking no action against them while he exhorts our allies to. Any rational Soviet leader has long ago dismissed him as all talk... >..............................How many countries have fallen to >to communism during this administration? Answer: -1 (greneda). The Reagan administration claimed it intervened in Greneda in order to (1) preserve the security of the Caribbean and (2) to safeguard American medical students. The only substantive support for the first that was provided was the description of the new airstrip (which the Cubans were building with Western European financial backing) as being primarily for military purposes. Reagan had dismissed the claim of the Bishop government that the airstrip was necessary to accomadate tourist traffic as "absurd", yet is now helping finish the strip in order to -- get this -- promote tourism. As for the students, I would not question protecting their safety, but I have yet to have heard anything even suggesting they really were in danger. Listen to the students themselves. They talk of being cut off from the outside world, and of having observed armed Cubans near campus. Reason enough for worry and even fear on the part of the students, but they were never threatened and the Reagan administration has not seen fit to explain why it believed they were. Sure, being on an island cut off from the US while a violent coup is underway is damn scary, but there is a difference between being scared and being in danger. >I do it because he will install supreme court justices who will >not try to legislate, and will move for more common sense >in our nonsensical legal system. I have no trouble understanding our legal system, and I don't see why so many prosecutors and police departments are so anxious to expand their powers rather than perform their jobs correctly. As far as the courts "legislating", this is a charge made by those who resent the courts from restraining legislative perogative, but that's what they're SUPPOSED to do. David Rubin {allegra|astrovax|princeton}!fisher!david