Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site bbncca.ARPA Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxj!ihnp4!bbncca!rrizzo From: rrizzo@bbncca.ARPA (Ron Rizzo) Newsgroups: net.politics Subject: Re: To all those voting for Mondale (or undecided) Message-ID: <1068@bbncca.ARPA> Date: Fri, 26-Oct-84 11:41:27 EDT Article-I.D.: bbncca.1068 Posted: Fri Oct 26 11:41:27 1984 Date-Received: Sat, 27-Oct-84 04:21:26 EDT References: <494@ccice2.UUCP> Organization: Bolt, Beranek and Newman, Cambridge, Ma. Lines: 68 Actually, there really is reason for voting for Mondale/Ferrarro even if you don't like them or their positions. Interviews with heads of all major factions in the GOP (NYTimes Magazine, 9/10/84) reveal most believe that Reagan will die in office due to a collapse of health. They also agree that, beginning Nov. 7th, a furious allout fight for control of the Republican Party will begin. The Republicans are divided far more bitterly than the Democrats & only the personality of Reagan has provided an illusion of unity, something which will cease on reelection: most GOP leaders believe Reagan will take little or no interest in party affairs after the election. The self-avowed crazies of the New Christian [sic.] Right (Howard Phillips, Richard Viguerie, etc.) are (as usual) talking bloodily about purging the supporters of Reagan the "hypocrite" (note the Khomeini-ism) and capturing controp of the party. Altho' the NCR lacks voter appeal, they have vast resources of $$, minions, & mail for effec- tively waging a successful power struggle in an organization like the GOP. Moderates & traditional Republicans seem relatively demoralized & altho' not saying much they're probably anxious about their future (if they have one). Even worse, a symposium of moderate & liberal political observers (see NYR, "The Election & After", pp. 33-38, 8/16/84) believe a reelected Reagan-with-a-"mandate" will even try to enforce Reaganomics again; they expect economic disaster will result but disagree about timing (2nd or 3rd year?) and impact (will it favor Democrats or "radical populists" on the far right?). In other words, a vote for Reagan won't likely be for Reagan but for Bush and/or the extreme right. Despite the chaos within & without the GOP that may result, it doesn't necessarily mean the Democrats will gain, but it may considerably strengthen the hand of the lunatic fringe. So even moderate, traditional, & thoughtful Republicans should seriously consider voting Democratic on November 6th: a vote for Reagan has little to do with Republicanism as they know it. Finally, don't be fatalistic! The "majority" isn't behind Reagan. Voter turnout has progressively declined for 20 years. Only 27% of eligible voters voted in 1980; that election was a particularly strong example of the American habit of negative voting, not for a candidate but against an opponent (see any standard political science text). Opinion polls aren't very credible: the two major polling organizations have been politically biased for some time now (Gallup's is pro-GOP, Harris's pro-Democrat). Besides, voters elect, not polls. As a novelty item, here's an "abberant" polling result. 2/3rds of the Harvard University undergraduate body (4,000 people) were polled this week. The findings were: Mondale 61% Reagan 28% Among black students, Mondale won 85%-8%, among women, Mondale got 72%, & 58% of the men favored Mondale. The poll was conducted by the Institute of Politics. What possible relevance does Ha-vuhd student opinion have for the electorate? The Institute explained the surprising results as due to the fact that the students are issue-oriented. The poll then gives us a glimpse of the kind of verdict the general public is capable of deli- vering on November 6th if they decide to vote on the issues. In its own way Harvard's a crosssection of the country with more than a few conserva- tives in its midst. So, VOTE! & vote well! on November 6th! "Ronnie Reagan is no good, Send him back to Hollywood!" Ron Rizzo