Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site burdvax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!harvard!godot!mit-eddie!genrad!decvax!ittvax!dcdwest!sdcsvax!akgua!psuvax1!burdvax!bnapl
From: bnapl@burdvax.UUCP (Tom Albrecht)
Newsgroups: net.politics,net.motss
Subject: Re: Re: Corrupting Youth
Message-ID: <1783@burdvax.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 8-Nov-84 12:30:40 EST
Article-I.D.: burdvax.1783
Posted: Thu Nov  8 12:30:40 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 10-Nov-84 06:37:24 EST
References: <215@rlgvax.UUCP> <bbncca.1062>
Reply-To: bnapl@burdvax.UUCP (Tom Albrecht)
Organization: Burroughs Corp. - SDG/Devon
Lines: 21
Xref: godot net.politics:2872 net.motss:869Summary: 

In article <bbncca.1062> rrizzo@bbncca.ARPA (Ron Rizzo) writes:
>For the nature of the ruckus over the Review's publishing personal
>info about attendees at a gay students meeting, see my original
>posting, or even Tom Albrecht's quote from NATIONAL REVIEW.  There's
>no need to speculate, particularly when it's used as an occasion
>to retail a few bigoted opinions.
>
>						Cheers,
>						Ron Rizzo

	The question seems to be whether the reporter violated any rules of
conduct.  Now, if this was an open meeting on college property for an
organization sponsored with students' money then why shouldn't it have been
reported on?  Suppose it was the Young Nazi Party or the Whaleoil Alliance
taking college funds; shouldn't they be subject to observation from
outsiders?  If these folk want to come out of the closet they better be
prepared to come under the scrutiny of the light of day.

-- 
Tom Albrecht 		Burroughs Corp.
			...{presby|psuvax|sdcrdcf}!burdvax!bnapl