Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site qantel.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxj!ihnp4!zehntel!dual!qantel!ken
From: ken@qantel.UUCP (Ken Nichols@ex6193)
Newsgroups: net.religion
Subject: Re: Re:  Nichols on Maroney (A Ba'laam Blessing?)
Message-ID: <266@qantel.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 26-Oct-84 13:25:04 EST
Article-I.D.: qantel.266
Posted: Fri Oct 26 13:25:04 1984
Date-Received: Sun, 28-Oct-84 05:42:37 EST
References: <239@qantel.UUCP> <1094@ihuxm.UUCP> <243@qantel.UUCP> <1453@qubix.UUCP> <212@pyuxd.UUCP> <863@ihuxn.UUCP>
Organization: MDS Qantel, Hayward, CA
Lines: 19

> The only  way I could consider Ken's posting as a rebuttal to
> Tim's article is by assuming a double standard - one standard for
> god and another standard for the rest of the universe.  Does it 
> imply that what we recognize as a low moral standard (e.g. killing
> innocent people) is reversed when it is applied to god? When God 
> bears the responsibility for the death of the innocent, is he 
> to be judged as having high moral standards?
> -- 
> 
> Yosi Hoshen

Noone is innocent in the sight of a Holy God.  There is no such thing.  All
men deserve death and punishment forever in Hell.
-- 


"...holding forth the                              Ken Nichols
 word of life..." Phil. 2:16                       ...!ucbvax!dual!qantel!ken
------------